New Video: It’s Getting Her WET That Counts!

AWESOME !! I would like to hear the rest. I’m also wondering if this was at the January 2010 LA Seminar.

The seduction community is sick and the keep babbling about stupid explanations and reasoning for thing they don’t understand themselves, and waste their time collecting telephone numbers and arranging dates.

Ross, I wanna see a followup video to this.

It´s really a f@@@ing breakthrough the knowledge that women fractionate between those different states because it´s their way to experience feelings and even to understand the world around them. Actually they do this all the time in all aspects of their lives, and i believe that is the real deal on learning how to comunicate with women. All other “methods” don´t take this into consideration and try to take the women to their world by demonstrating “value”, instead they should try to get into the women´s world by talking in a way that she can understand and verify with their way of experiencing things. If you want to take a perfect working ship from point A to point B, you´d better learn how to cruise it, by understanding how it works, rather than taking it out of water and puting it over a truck…

Now i realize how a weird metaphor it was… what i wanted to say is that the best way to take a car from point A to point B is by driving it, and not by puting it over your shoulders… to do that you must learn how it operates, and it´s the same thing with women.

Dino, that is a fantastic metaphor. I’m going to steal it. Yes, SS gives you a deep insight into the operatiing system and machine language of women, so you can write your own application programs!

Ross,

It’s ok to use terms like “machine language”.. but keep in mind when you say that, I’m thinking assembly language. Assembly language is not so efficient now-a-days (it is very efficient and the most precise.. but obscure for the programmer to always understand the best), except in real particular applications and device driver programming. Any computer that has an operating system installed, should be programmed, 95% of the time, not with “machine language” but a higher-level language.

It is much easier for the programmer to organize the operations of the computer and integrate those particular and verbose operations of the microprocessor with his concepts. Your metaphor disturbs me a little bit because I, very quickly (and equally very quickly correct my cognition), take it to mean: we must learn all the different tiny particular operations down to the axons and myelinated nerves of the female brain in order to seduce them.

No, all we need is a structured way of communicating with an abstract language that a higher-level programming language such as C provides. Machine language is about operating at the fundamental bit patterns and opcodes of the microprocessor.. that’s too verbose and difficult to organize into meaningful concepts and communcation.

Machine language and assembly languages vary across microprocessor platforms too! Highler-level langagues, on the otherhand, are portable because the compiler translates it into the specific machine operations of that CPU.. in other words, we do not need to know those verbose operations of the CPU most of the time in order to write a powerful application! Just an abstract programming language.

Also, a WOMAN was a leading pioneer in the development and use of higher-level programming languages: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grace_Murray_Hopper

Another woman also originated the idea of using a language to operate a computer.. her name was Ada and worked with Charles Babbage. She is considered by many to be the first computer programmer, although her program was never executed. (afaik)

Simply put, write in C. 😉 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5LNTTGDKYo

“If you’ve just spent nearly 30 hours
Debugging some assembly,
Soon you will be glad to
Write in C.”

(I realize I just spent like 15 minutes expressing this.. oh well! Just reinforces what I know! 😉

i like it too… it also applies to other aspects of women, like when you drive a car you don´t keep track of every instrument or every noise in your way, if you do, you´re going to crash, just like you don´t have to take care of each micromovement of the women´s eye to seduce her… and to drive a car you don´t step in the accelerator before starting the engine or act and feel like a burglar to do a test drive (these i stole from you), meaning respectively to things in a certain order in a seduction and not to feel anxious just because you´re talking with a woman… actually, one of the most important tools i think you use in your teachings are exactly the metaphors, there are some unbeliavebly usefull and true that really hit the road 🙂 (just to keep the theme here…)

Ross in the Boss!

When are you coming over to Europe? Hmm… on the other hand it might be a good idea to see if I get an even better response from chicks in LA 😉

Sir, you are very inspiring and I just love your explanations and use of NLP. I’ve being taught by Bandler myself and just to see you using the stuff for SS gets me firing on all 4 cylinders. Working through the Frame Control LA ’99 Disc I ordered from you staring the Major 🙂

Hey Ross,

Listening to your 3.0 seminar on my Ipod I come across a line you saying something like….if we could observe ourselves with clarity, without buying into the thoughts, then we could have a better understanding of others around us (specially women).
My question to you is….what’s the best thing to comment about a young woman? (18-23) Her energy?The way she carries herself? What would she do rather than being in the place you met her?

Thanks.

WTF was poster number 6 going on about?!?

Roooss! Not only do You have this Deep Understanding of how women think but You have this way of installing Beliefs in us.

Really The Best One out there!